I am using a blog from a previous class so you can listen to my podcast. I had to actually make a movie file with Windows Movie Maker because you can't put just a music file on this blog. It has to be an image or a video. So, with Windows Movie Maker I put a picture to go along with the mp3 to make it a "video" so I could put it on this blog. It took a while to figure that out, but it's done. The podcast is a commercial for a book fair. Push the play button to the left and under the picture.
ETEC561MikeDouthit
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Section 7: New Directions for Instructional Design and Technology
1. Distributed learning in academic settings refers to traditional colleges and universities offering online courses in addition to traditional “go to class” courses. It also refers to virtual universities. These are universities that do not offer the choice of physical classrooms. All courses are on-line, and there is no traditional campus per se. A student is able to get a degree without ever stepping into a traditional classroom. That’s pretty amazing to me. I can see this avenue of getting a degree getting more and more popular. It would also seem to be more economical. A student would be able to stay at home and take classes, however, there is something to be said for going away to college and soaking in that experience. I wouldn’t trade my four years in College Station for anything.
Corporate distributed learning offers training via a corporate intranet. These training sessions are always available to employees so they don’t have to wait on a corporate training schedule with limited offerings for classes. This is fiscally sound to companies and corporations. Out-of-town training and all the costs associated with that are eliminated or greatly reduced with this type of distributed learning. The courses that employees have taken are managed by a learning management system, so companies can keep track of who has taken what courses and what they have learned.
Virtual classes are classes that are experienced via the internet and called an online class. Virtual classes create a learning environment with live chats, and questions for teachers are sent via e-mail or asked during virtual office hours. Groups of students can even meet at a predetermined time in a chat room to discuss ideas for a group project.
Hybrid classes are online classes that still retain some element of having a traditional physical meeting place. Students may meet the instructor a few times a semester for presentations or for assessments. I had a library science class that met at the beginning and end of the semester.
Learning Is Wonderful!! |
Skills-based training involves training for specific skills. For example, a plumber might take a course on pipe fitting. She is taking a class to learn a specific set of skills to improve her ability to do her job. There are many benefits to this type of training: increased productivity, reduced employee turnover, and reduced need for employee supervision.
2. The text defines reusability as “the ability to use the same resource multiple times in multiple ways and in multiple contexts”. This allows learning to be reinvented and repackaged so it can be used in other contexts and fields. Applying the learning and adapting it to your needs can save time and money. New content can be reused instead of redeveloping it. I took a library course in cataloging and classification a few semesters ago. I really enjoyed the class, and I think because of my biology background I really enjoyed the classification aspect. It was sort of like a puzzle to solve. Overall, the cataloging and the MARC records information, such as where to put the comma and what needs a semicolon verses what needs a colon and where the period should go, all seemed a little tedious. I work in a district where I don’t have to do any cataloging at all. All cataloging is done at our Library Services Department. So, I guess the reusablility aspect of this class is pretty low for me. I think librarians would be better served if there were two cataloging classes. One could be for students who want to pursue a career in cataloging, and then a class for librarians who want to work in a school or public library.
3. For an example of rich media, I found a video online that demonstrates how to change a tire. This video incorporates sound and text as well. Each step is written for the viewer to read, and a narrator talks the viewer through each step. The video is of a real car and a real tire being changed. This is much more visually informative than, say, an animated video. Even though I have changed many tires, I still learned something new (the lug nuts are to be loosened and removed in a star pattern). I think this video would be very effective in teaching someone how to change a tire because it is very media rich, however learning how to change a tire by actually doing it is probably the ideal way to learn.
4. Nanotechnology has to do with the miniaturization of technology. A definition I found defined it as “the branch of engineering that deals with things smaller than 100 nanometers (especially with the manipulation of individual molecules). I remember reading a series of books, when I was but a lad, called the Foundation Trilogy by Isaac Asimov (truly a genius who wrote scholarly works on everything from physics to Shakespeare). In this series, all devices were powered by microscopic nuclear reactors. I thought about how impossible that sounded, but science fiction can become science fact. Computers that are the size of a wrist watch would be a wonderful device to have. You could use voice commands to write e-mails or documents, and then tell it to print to a wifi printer. It could be used to locate books with the online catalog in the library. All of it would be voice activated, of course.
5. It seems to me as if the “straight and narrow road” is sort of like the old school way of thinking or doing things. It wants to cling to its traditions and keep sacred its foundational tenets. Its methods of inquiry are the “established research methods”. Its language is precise and straightforward, and it wants to keep outsiders out (“Tighten up the boundaries to ensure expertise and encourage strong credentialing and certification requirements.) I guess I tend to lean to this way of thinking. I think tradition and sticking to foundational tenets is important in keeping core ideals at the forefront, otherwise it becomes something else or a watered down version of itself. You might call these people purists. On the other hand, sometimes this way of thinking is resistant to change even if the change is for the good. You shouldn’t cling to something if it is outdated and ineffective just because it’s what we are used to or comfortable with. Sometimes change is for the better (What a cathartic last sentence for my blog!!).
Ain't that the TRUTH!! |
Friday, March 4, 2011
Section 6: Getting an IDT Position and Succeeding at It
1. I found an instructional designer position offered by Monitronics International, a home security alarm monitoring company based in Dallas, through careerbuilder.com. This position requires development and design of instructional training platforms and materials for a variety of training projects (call center training, new employee training, management training, and operational training needs). Job requirements include: Bachelor’s degree in Instructional Design (or related field), 2-5 yrs experience with developing instructional courses (required), 2-5 yrs of experience developing e-learning courses (preferred), ability to write learner-centered training objectives, experience with instructional design methodologies, and experience in creating pre-and post-assessments. Alas, I would not meet the requirements for this job.
The second position I found, also through careerbuilder.com, is offered by Jack Henry and Associates, a company that develops, markets, maintains and supports integrated data processing systems for in-house automation of standard banking and accounting applications. They are looking for an Instructional Design Specialist (IDS) to develop eLearning courses for external and internal customers. Essential functions include: researching, designing, scheduling, and implementing eLearning training projects, updating existing eLearning courses, and conducting training classes in a live or on-line virtual environment. Minimum qualifications are Bachelor’s degree (preferred), minimum of 12 months to 3 years of educational development training, and training knowledge. Under knowledge and skills were: desired experience with Adobe Flash, Adobe Illustrator, sound editing software such as Audacity or Sound Forge, Adobe Photoshop, and PowerPoint. I am familiar with most of the software listed, and I have some training knowledge, but I don’t have any experience designing eLearning training projects.
The third position is offered by Lockheed Martin for their San Francisco offices. The position is listed as Site Team Leader & Instructional Designer. Job responsibilities include: being able to read, write, speak, and understand English (can do!), be responsible for the “people management” for Petaluma, Alameda, and Oklahoma City (Oklahoma!! What?), and have instructional designer responsibilities. To me, these job duties are pretty vague. I think I could do what they listed. The requirements include a Master’s degree in Instructional Systems, Instructional Systems Technology, or Education (with a concentration in Educational Technology) or 5 years of work experience in a related field or a combination of education and training, be proficient in Microsoft Word, Outlook, Excel, PowerPoint, and computer graphics programs, and be a certified Master Training Specialist (I remember reading about the certifications in the text). Again, I have all of the software proficiency, but I don’t have the Master’s degree in the fields required.
2. I used www.careeronestop.org assessment called Skills Profiler. You rate yourself in many categories (Basic Skills, Social Skills, Problem Solving Skills, Technical Skills, System Skills, Resource Management Skills, and Desktop Computer Skills) on a scale from 1 to 7. I rated myself on each category. I don’t know if I have a glorified image of myself, or what, but I came out higher than average for each category. The suggested fields were education, science, and math fields. This sounds about right for me as these are my interests and what I have experience in. Usually when I fill out this type of assessment I get something really wacky like florist or landscape design. It felt good to get something I would really be interested in.
3. Professional Organizations
The first organization I research was the Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE). It was founded in 2004 (the text says 2003). Its objective is to “promote the conduct and communication of scientific research related to all aspects of the use of computers in education, especially within the Asia-Pacific.” The cost of membership is $60 and $20 for students. The only publication I could find was their newsletter which comes out three times a year. The only conference mentioned is the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2011, which will be held from November 29-December 2 in Thailand.
Next, I researched the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Its mission is to strive to advance knowledge about education, to encourage scholarly inquiry related to education, and to promote the use of research to improve education and serve the public good. Membership for regular members is $150 and $40 for graduate students. The website lists several publications it is affiliated with (American Education Research Journal SIA Section, American Education Research Journal TLHD Section, Educational Researcher, and Review of Education Research). It hosts an annual meeting. This year’s meeting will be in New Orleans, April 8 through April 12. This year’s theme is “Inciting the Social Imagination: Education Research for the Public Good”. It offers professional development and training courses on such topics as “Introduction to Hierarchical Linear Modeling”, “Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications”, and “How to Inform Policy Makers: A Strategic Approach for Academics”. These courses range from $95 to $115.
Finally, I looked at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT). Its mission is to provide international leadership by promoting scholarship and best practices in the creation, use, and management of technologies for effective teaching and learning in a wide range of settings. The cost of membership ranges from $75 for students to $400 for corporations. Members have access to the Tech Trends, Educational Technology Research and Development, Handbook for Research and Technology, and Getting Started in Educational Technology Research. The AECT International Convention will be held November 8-11 in Jacksonville, Florida. The conference is called “Celebrate 3.0: Design, Learn, Community” and costs $150 for early registration.
Professional Publications
The American Educational Research Journal publishes “original empirical and theoretical studies and analysis in education to improve education processes and outcomes.” There are several pages of submission guidelines. Some of the highlights include: APA style, between 20 and 50 pages in length, an abstract of 100-120 words, a notes and references section, and it should have tables, figures, and illustrations. It is peer reviewed and is online.
The American Journal of Distance Education’s mission is “to disseminate information about research and scholarship in the Americas”. This journal seeks original submissions about methods and techniques of teaching at a distance, about learning, and about management and administration. It is peer reviewed and can be found online. The website states that its audience is teachers, trainers, adult educators, and researchers.
The International Journal of Training and Development is an international forum for the reporting of high-quality, original, empirical research. This journal publishes research which ranges from the theoretical, conceptual and methodological to more policy-oriented types of work. There are many requirements that need to be met for publication: The article should be between 5,000 and 9,000 words, have double spaced with margins, will be reviewed with a “double blind” procedure, should have an abstract, and have precise references. The journal is peer reviewed and is available online.
The organizations and publications I researched seem to be great conduits for information and opportunities to present information. All of the publications I looked at really put an emphasis on wanting research and papers to be submitted to them. They encourage research and want this new research in their publications. All of the organizations would seem like great resources for getting a position. The more people you know, the more opportunities you’ll have. I was not aware of these organizations and publications before I started this assignment. I was amazed that the text book had listings for so many organizations and publications, and this is for one field of interest!!
4. To me, the competencies would include: Be a source of information (we have to educate and provide knowledge), improve communication, provide academic programs with information to improve and evaluate, be able to communicate with learners, and to provide flexible learning environments. There would also need to be mention of having the highest of professional standards of ethics, honesty, and integrity. I picked these because if I were learning from someone I would want them to have to follow these standards and practices.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Section 5: Trends and Issues in Various Settings
f
1. Rapid prototyping involves a working model of a project that is still in the planning stage. By putting the working model through early tests, the rest of the project time (planning and revision needed for the final product) will be reduced. Time consuming revisions can be done on the fly and those involved will definitely feel more ownership of the final product. For education, I can see this type of methodology being put to good use in a science class. For example, if students were studying the effects of an earthquake on buildings and the amount of force a building is required to withstand, smaller models of the buildings might be a good idea for the students to work with initially. During this stage, students can test out theories and learn about the strengths and weaknesses of different materials and how they should be put together. If changes or improvements need to be made, they are done to the prototype first, which is then retested. Once students are satisfied with the smaller prototype, the same features and ideas that went into to prototype can be easily transferred to the larger model.
Using a simulator for training |
2. 2. The full spectrum diagram shows “Skill Level” along the x-axis and “Rank/Capability” along the y-axis. Obviously for this training we would want a positive slope. The training target is high skill level and high capability no matter what the environment. This will ensure that there are no weak links. A weak link in a military setting can be disastrous and cost lives and millions of dollars. Since the setting for the delivery of training varies, it is important that training can occur and be effective in any environment. To ensure this happens trainers need to be mindful and know their students. Trainers need to know how their students learn best and under what conditions. One example in the book discussed cooks, many of whom were Hispanic, that had difficulty learning with computer-based training because they had limited experience with computers. Using a blended approach of computer training and an instructor proved to be more effective. For the scenario concerning being hired as a consultant, if technology is to be part of the training and electronic access is not always available, obviously something portable and easy to transport will be necessary. A cart with laptops or smaller netbooks preloaded the training modules and simulations would seem to be a logical solution. This way electricity will not be an issue (make sure you have good battery life) and training can proceed as usual.
3. A staff development to introduce GSTE would begin with an ice-breaker where staff members would work in small groups and list those “core values” they feel are necessary to uphold in order for our school to meet its goals. Each small group would then list their core values. This would be the launching pad for ideas to foster these core values. These ideas would be written next to the core values. Finally, small groups would discuss the short term and long term activities that would have to take place in order for us to achieve our goals.
To introduce staff members to the concepts behind Step-Up-To-Excellence, I would ask them to talk about 5 topics: 1. What should be the motivators for our district leaders?
2. Should we think of our district as a whole system or as individual schools?
3. Can we solve our own issues and obstacles?
4. What changes are needed in our district in order to achieve our district’s goals?
5. What human, financial, and technical resources are needed to achieve our district’s goals?
This would spawn healthy dialogue and conversation which would then lead to the introduction of the 5 Steps to whole district improvement. They would then see the sweeping effects and improvements that this strategy involves and how it works. I would present examples of other districts that embraced this methodology aimed at whole-district improvements and highlight the strides and improvements they achieved using this process.
4. 4. The first university I was able to locate with information about faculty development was the University of Iowa. It uses the term “faculty development”. This department is under the Office of the Executive Vice-President and Provost. It offers resources and workshops for all faculty members, information about the Office of the Provost's annual series of workshops for departmental executive officers, and access to a campus-wide faculty development calendar. Looking at the spring calendar, all of the faculty development classes were over a two day period. There were seven different classes, including Engage: The Expanding Classroom, ICON Communication Tools, and SITA: Projects in Practice.
Next was Michigan State University. Its department for faculty development is called the Office of Faculty and Organizational Development and is under the Office of the Provost. It offers MSU faculty, academic staff, and administrators seminars and programs on faculty and instructional development and organizational and leadership development. Under “Faculty and Instructional Development Opportunities”, there are seminars and workshops (Spring Institute on College Teaching & Learning, On-Demand Online Seminars, Workshops for Faculty Leaders, and Programs for Academic Specialists), Cohort Programs (Faculty Learning Communities, Lilly Teaching Fellows, and Walter and Pauline Adams Academy for Instructional Excellence and Innovation), and a section called Community Building (Faculty Social Gatherings, Faculty Development Network, and Faculty Emeriti Association). All of these faculty and staff development sessions seem to be spread out over the entire school year.
Lastly, I came across Armstrong Atlantic State University in Savannah, Georgia. Its department is called “faculty development” and is under “Faculty Resources” which is under “Academics”. It offers information on awards, grants, new faculty, and teaching resources. Under “Teaching Resources”, I found headings for Technology & Teaching (links for Virtual Resource Site for Teaching with Technology, The Visible Knowledge Project, Blended Learning, and Educational Technology Committee Blog @AASU), Faculty Development Seminars, Communities, and Roundtables, and Web Resources (Problem-Based Learning, Teaching & Learning Center Resources, and Professional & Organizational Development, to name a few), Website Development, and Podcasting Resources.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Section 4: Human Performance Technology
1. I have used many non-instructional techniques to enhance student performance. Using an attendance chart is a good way to encourage students to come to school. If students are in school each day that week, they receive a silver star. When they have accrued 5 silver stars, they get a gold star. All the students talk about the stars and how many they have. Attendance improves and therefore should help student performance. After all, if they aren’t there, they can’t learn. I have also used many different forms of behavioral modifications programs. Passing out tickets for drawings at the end of the week has always been effective. I would randomly pass out tickets when students were following directions. The reward was always random. I had read that random positive reinforcement was a very strong reinforcer (see slot machines). Students who had collected more tickets during the week would have increased odds at winning a prize. This would give us a chance to learn about probability. After a while I would hear students saying things like “increasing my probability of winning.” and "my odds are increasing." They knew that more tickets meant a better chance of winning. It was a great way to get students to follow directions. It was kind of funny. I kept the tickets in my pocket, so after a while all I would have to do is put my hand in my pocket and the students would get on task. This really cut down on discipline issues.
Paperclip Guy!! |
2. Searching the internet for more information about electronic performance support systems, I found some different terms. One site used the terms e-learning, Process Embedded Learning, and the phrase “guided help.” I like the phrase e-learning because that’s exactly what it is: electronic learning. EPSS, or e-learning, provides workers with tools and resources on demand. These are built into many applications that we use every day. For example, Microsoft word has a tutorial that will show me how to use all of its tools and features. I don’t have to call someone to learn how to set margins or change fonts. I just call on that little paperclip guy who magically appears on the screen, or I could simply read the tutorial. To help out librarians, our library services department has a wiki page that will help you solve a myriad of problems from how to hook up a dvd player (there are illustrations and text to follow) to how to check out a book to a student. These were put in place so we could learn about them more efficiently when we need to learn about them. One thing I noticed that our text book does mention is that text and graphics are the most commonly used media types in these EPSSs. I think using more audio and visual tutorials might be effective, especially for those who learn better that way. This could contribute to EPSSs not being fully embraced. Another reason might be that people just prefer to be taught by a “teacher”. Whether it’s a one on one teaching situation, or it’s a traditional classroom situation, I think many prefer that mode of instruction to an electronic/media database of information. This maybe a digital native/digital immigrant thing, so as time goes by EPSSs will become the standard for training and on-going services. Those who have grown up with EPSSs will be accustomed to them, and this will be the norm.
Data, Data, Data!! |
3. On my campus, Edna Rowe Elementary, we are very concerned about our TAKS scores. It is ultimately how our school is judged. Agree with it or not, this is the hand the state of Texas has dealt us. So…our students take district benchmark tests, and we test students formally and informally throughout the school year. We also give our students TAKS tests from previous years. We do this to generate information and data on each student. We have meetings and look at all the data (tables, charts, etc.)to help us guide our instructional strategies. We are able to gauge which teaching strategies are effective and which are not. Small groups and after-school tutoring groups are determined from this data as well. We are able to make good decisions to guide and shape instruction if we have good data. Here’s the rub. Do we teach to the test? It is very tempting to do this, and I know some schools that operate this way. Their students pass that test, but is that really what we want to create: a bunch of test takers? Or...do we want students who can problem solve, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and think critically? By ensuring students have opportunities to do all of these things and by providing a standard of academic rigor, our students will have the best of both worlds. Yes, students have to practice bubbling in answers and need to see a practice TAKS test before they take the real one, but these should not dominate the curriculum. Students would be much better served if they are given opportunities to think critically and problem solve. These are the skills they will need throughout their lives to be successful.
Super Motivation For Learning!! |
4. “Informal learning gives learners more control of what, where, and how they learn and usually involves intrinsic motivation.” (Reiser & Dempsey, p.167) To me, this is the ideal learning situation. The motivation drives the learner to seek out and learn despite no clear cut direction showing him the way. It is simply a quest for knowledge. Lately, I have been spending a lot of time with iTunes, my iPad, and my iPhone. Most of what I have learned about these items has been learned by exploring, talking to friends, and reading blogs and forums. None of this learning has come from formal instruction (classroom setting, training program, etc.). I feel that because I am so motivated and interested in learning about these technologies, I don’t see this as work. It’s more like fun and play. This truly maximizes learning. In a classroom setting where motivation is high, students are much more likely to be engaged and eager to learn, and if students can take more control of their learning and feel connected to what they are learning, they will benefit all the more. They will be like me learning about my iPad and iPhone.
What A Class!! |
Friday, February 11, 2011
Section 3: Evaluating, Implementing and Managing Instructional Programs and Projects
1. The first model of evaluation I researched is called the Bates’ ACTIONS Model. It was developed at the British Open University and was designed to specifically to help in analyzing and selecting appropriate technology. This would seem to be extremely useful for the educational setting. The steps in this model of evaluation involve access, cost, teaching and learning, interactivity and user-friendliness, organizational issues, novelty, and speed. The first thing to consider is access. Does the technology fit the learners, and is it accessible to them? In other words, there is no point in writing lesson plans using iPads if they are not available to students. The next notion to consider is cost. Is the purchase of this technology in the budget? What is the cost of the technology per student? How does the cost of this technology compare to another type of technology? Teaching and Learning involves the marriage of the technology to what needs to be learned. What objectives are being met by using this technology? Next is interactivity and user-friendliness. Will students learn to use the new technology rather easily? Will it encourage interaction among students? Organizational issues concern the ability of the campus to incorporate the new technology and possible barriers that need to be overcome, while novelty considers the newness of the technology and its technical capabilities. Lastly is the speed lessons can be created with this technology. This model would be a great tool for evaluating possible new technologies to a campus. It takes into account aspects such as practicality, cost, and ease of use.
The second evaluation model I researched is called the Program Action-Logic Model. The first aspect to consider is INPUT, or what we are willing to put into or invest in our learning program. These could include staff, time, money, materials, etc. Next to be considered are the OUTPUTS, or the activities and participants. What we do and who we reach. In a school setting, this would concern the delivery of the lesson and the students who benefits from the lesson. Lastly, the OUTCOMES IMPACT is considered. It can be considered in terms of its short term and long term impacts. What skills have been learned? Have attitudes been changed? What knowledge have students acquired? This seemingly simple model could be easily applied to lessons in any classroom. It breaks it down to very basic components. To me, this would be a good tool, for say, new teachers.
2. A recent technological innovation to our campus is iStation. iStation is an on-line reading program with curriculum based assessments. Each student sets up his own account and is able to track his progress. Each classroom computer has iStation. It is a campus initiative that each student be logged onto iStation for a certain number of minutes each week. The number of minutes is determined by grade level. The relative advantage is very obvious; students will improve their reading and comprehension levels. There is no problem with compatibility. Each classroom has 3 or 4 computers that will run the program. Teachers have committed the time for students to rotate on the computers. There is no issue with complexity. iStation is very straightforward and easy to use and navigate. There was some apprehension when teachers found out they were responsible for downloading the program and installing the program. As far as trialability is concerned, the software had already been purchased by the school district. The observability aspect would be seeing the benefits of students using the program to improve their reading and comprehension. Overall, teachers have reported seeing improvement in DRA scores.
3. Situational Leadership is a four-phase model for developing leadership skills and influencing individuals (Reiser & Dempsey, 2007). It uses a four cycle approach based on the maturity of your project team. So, if I was to develop a series of professional development sessions focusing on technology use in the classroom for teachers and dealing with an inexperienced staff, I would initially have to be very hands-on, detailed, and have a very directive leadership style, while at the same time avoiding coming across as overly demanding or difficult. As time goes by and the team is feeling more confident with the use of the technology, I would not need to be as hands-on or directive as I was initially. My job would be to simply explain and clarify. Hopefully, the staff is starting to really believe in this initiative and starting to feel more at ease. This allows the staff to use the technology more and more on their own. My role as leader would continue to change. I would start to focus more on results and ensure that the teachers are encouraged and receive positive feedback for their efforts and hard work. As the teachers continue to master their technology use, I would have less involvement and would simply monitor. The teachers are functioning and producing on their own. I was there to hold their hands, so to speak, at the beginning, but they are now able to work without close supervision. Communication is very vital at each transition to less and less direct supervision, and this will help to ensure that team members feel comfortable at each stage.
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Section 2 Theories and Models of Learning and Instruction
I chose using shelf markers properly when browsing for books in the library as a learning objective. When browsing for books, students must use their shelf markers. If a student wants to take a book off the shelf, he must put a shelf marker next to the book. This temporarily holds the book's place on the shelf while the student looks at the book. If the student decides he wants to check out the book, he takes the shelf marker off the shelf, but if the student doesn't want the book, he puts it back on the shelf where the shelf marker is holding the book's place. Once the book is back to its original place, the shelf marker can be removed, and the student can continue to browse the shelves for books. Students are taught that the books are in a specific order and the reasons for this order.
Using the Behavioral Learning Theory, I would give immediate feedback to students if they used the shelf marker correctly. I would also use positive reinforcement in order to reinforce the desired behavior. I would call out a student's name and say aloud what a good job that student did using her shelf marker. I might even give out stickers to students who followed the steps correctly. This will reinforce the desired behavior. If a student did not follow procedures, I might ask him to put his shelf marker up, sit down at his table, and observe how other students are using their shelf markers. This is an unfavorable response, so according to the behavioral learning theory, it will not be reinforced. When the desired behavior is demonstrated, a positive response would reinforce it.
Using the Situated Learning Theory, "learning from a situated perspective occurs through the learner's participation in the practices of a community, practices that are mutually constituted by the members of the community" (Reiser & Dempsey, 2007). Using the objective of learning to use a shelf marker correctly while browsing for books, students interacting with each other and with the library is like a community. There are certain behaviors and actions that are specific to a library setting. There is a library culture. Students are even eager to show new students "how things are done" in our library. They want those students to be part of the community of the library and to be successful in the library. So, with help from other community members (students) and wanting to be part of the community, new students usually learn how to correctly use the shelf marker pretty quickly.
Gagne's 9 Events of Instruction
I found a website (http://de.ryerson.ca/portals/de/assets/resources/Gagne%27s_Nine_Events.pdf) that listed and defined Gagne's Nine Events of Instruction. The information is from the G. Raymond Chang School of Continuing Education.
Gagne’s 9 Events | First Principals of Instruction |
Gain Attention | |
Inform Learner of Objectives | |
Stimulate recall of prior learning | Activate prior knowledge |
Present stimulus material | Demonstrate the new knowledge to be learned |
Provide learner guidance | Provide opportunity to apply new learning |
Elicit performance | Give learners the opportunity to integrate new knowledge into everyday activities |
Provide feedback | |
Assess performance | |
Enhance retention & transfer |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)